As a software engineer myself, this feature sounds unethical and dangerous. One has right to one’s data as that data can or may be required as evidence legally in a court of law (in another jurisdiction outside of the USA). If one’s account needs to be accessed and one intentionally violates terms and conditions, this can initiate a lock on the account and hence providing data to be inaccessible to prove innocence or guilt in a gourd proceedings - not withstanding, even when account is locked for any reason of any kind, access to data should be provided and even if access is denied, state why the data cannot be accessed. I understand to get to this stage in an app, they could have received different scenarios but then, who decides what is accessible and what isn’t ? If one has a memory of someone they lost (not alive), Snapchat can take that data away and keep it. They can use it elsewhere in AI and you won’t be able to find out or even contest because your account is locked. Im more curious of how Snapchat determines why users who get locked cannot even access their own data I.e, if the account is locked, their data is seized by Snapchat instead of being removed or deleted from their server. What happens to that data ???? Undetermined and very flexible to be used elsewhere ??? Interesting The problem here is if users account is locked and access is data is prohibited, why not delete or remove the users data and state it has been removed ? Why keep it, for what reason, if that data is hacked in anyway which is always possible, who would be held liable ? Will Snapchat take responsibility, how will the user know since they no longer have access to their account. This is a very interesting topic personally.